Newsletter
June
2002
REVIEW
OF RAPID DIAGNOSTIC TESTS FOR TUBERCULOSIS
Submitted by Dr.
Maricela Moffitt, Maricopa County Deputy TB Control Officer
Remember when we routinely
waited several weeks for lab results to confirm a suspected diagnosis of
tuberculosis? Now labs may be able to identify M. tuberculosis in as
little as 24 hours. (OK, sometimes it still takes several weeks.) How do
they do it? How reliable are the results?
Two methods can be used to
identify mycobacteria directly from a sputum specimen. High-performance
liquid chromatography (HPLC) recognizes several mycobacteria species based
on the mycolic acid “fingerprint” pattern with great accuracy.
However, it requires the presence of a fair number of organisms in the
sputum. Our State Laboratory currently does HPLC on sputum AFB smears
which are 2+ or greater.
The other method of direct
identification from sputum is nucleic acid amplification (NAA). Two tests
are currently available in the US, MTD-2 (by Genprobe) and Amplicor (by
Roche). MTD-2 is a DNA amplification technique. Amplicor uses PCR
amplification. Both are FDA-approved for smear positive sputum specimens.
Only MTD-2 is approved for smear negative specimens where there is high
clinical suspicion of tuberculosis. The CDC recommends that if the smear
and NAA are both positive, the patient can be presumed to have TB. If the
smear is positive and the NAA is negative, TB is not ruled out. The NAA
may sometimes be falsely negative due to the presence of inhibitors in the
sputum. In this situation, the CDC recommends sending another specimen for
repeat NAA testing and a test for inhibitors. If the repeat smear is still
positive, and the NAA is still negative, and no inhibitors are detected,
the patient may be presumed to have non-tuberculous mycobacteria. Due to
lower reliability in smear negative cases, MTD should only be run if there
is a high index of suspicion. If two MTD tests are positive on separate
smear-negative specimens, the patient can be presumed to have TB. However,
if smears are negative and the MTD is negative, these results should not
affect patient management. Up to 50% of these cases will ultimately prove
to be culture positive for M. tb.
State Lab will be moving
toward more use of HPLC for direct identification of mycobacteria in the
future due to new equipment which should able to make an identification on
smears with less than 2+ positivity. HPLC has at least two advantages over
NAA. It is substantially cheaper (thus enabling testing of more specimens
with the same public health buck). Also, it is able to specifically
identify several species of mycobacteria, as opposed to NAA which can only
tell you whether it’s TB or not TB. Both are considered preliminary test
results, to be confirmed by the gold standard culture. Cultures continue
to be needed to determine drug susceptibility.
“NAA tests can enhance
certainty, but they do not replace AFB smear or mycobacterial culture, and
they do not replace clinical judgment. Clinicians should interpret these
tests based on the clinical situation, and laboratories should perform NAA
testing only at the request of the physician and only on selected
specimens.” (MMWR, vol. 49, no.26, July 7, 2000.)
NEWS FROM
THE NATIONAL TUBERCULOSIS CONTROLLERS MEETING
The National
Tuberculosis Controllers Association (NTCA) held its annual meeting in
June in Alexandria, VA. Some interesting items presented include:
New TB control guidelines
for hospitals are expected from the CDC in approximately spring of 2003.
These will update “Preventing Transmission of M.tb in Health-care
Facilities, 1994.” One significant change will be a simplification of
the hospital risk assessment for TB, which determines how often employees
must be skin tested. In the new guidelines there will be only 3 risk
categories, low, medium, and ongoing transmission. Guidelines for
discontinuing isolation will be a little different: isolation may be
discontinued when 1) the likelihood of infectious TB is negligible, AND 2)
either another diagnosis is made OR there are 3 negative sputum smears.
The 3 sputa no longer have to be collected on different days, but must be
at least 8 hours apart and one must be an early morning specimen. The new
guidelines will extend to non-hospital settings such as correctional
facilities, hospices, laboratories, and emergency medical services.
Soon-to-be released
updated treatment guidelines from American Thoracic Society (ATS) and CDC
for active TB were previewed. Standard therapy has not changed. However,
an additional 3 months of treatment (7 months of continuation phase, total
9 months) will be recommended for patients who have cavitary disease and
whose sputum cultures have not converted to negative by 2 months into
treatment. Once weekly INH and rifapentine may be used in the continuation
phase for selected patients (non-cavitary disease, HIV negative, must be
smear negative at 2 months). Levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and gatifloxacin
may be used when there is resistance to first line drugs or the patient is
unable to tolerate them.
TB research with CDC
involvement was presented. We’ll review that in a coming issue of the TB
newsletter.
QuantiFERON-TB
update
Test kits for the new
TB blood test, QuantiFERON-TB, are now available through the new U.S.
headquarters of Cellestis, Inc. (See the March newsletter for more info
about the test-if you didn’t get it and want a copy, please email Cheryl
McRill.) Please note that this is a moderately complex laboratory test
which must be performed by a CLIA certified lab. It is not an office
procedure. As of this moment, there are no commercial, hospital, or public
health labs offering this test to patients, but several local labs are
exploring its use. Contact info for interested labs: Cellestis, Inc.,
28005 N. Smyth Drive, Valencia CA 91355, toll free 800-519-4627, fax
661-295-4625.
CDC guidelines for use of
the QuantiFERON-TB blood test are expected very soon. The current draft of
the guidelines was reviewed at the recent National TB Controllers
Association meeting. There will be two cut-offs for positive results, one
for patients at low risk for latent TB infection and one for those at high
risk. A point of discussion which is apparently still undecided is whether
to recommend confirmation of positive results with a traditional TB skin
test before beginning treatment for latent infection.
NEWS FROM
STATE LAB
The State Lab is now
including ofloxacin as part of its routine plate drug susceptibility panel
for M. tuberculosis. While ofloxacin is not the best clinical choice for
TB among the quinolones, it is cross-resistant or cross-susceptible with
the other quinolones. In other words, the isolate may be presumed to have
the same susceptibility or resistance to levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin as
it has to ofloxacin. Kanamycin was deleted from the panel to make room for
ofloxacin, but is still available on request if needed. As in the past,
most specimens will receive only susceptibility testing to the first line
drugs (isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide, ethambutol, and streptomycin).
These are done by the broth culture method which is much faster than the
plate method used for the full panel. The plate panel will always be done
automatically whenever there is resistance found to any first line drugs
other than isoniazid.
The State Lab will soon be
going to seven day per week staffing. The full crew will not be there on
Saturday and Sunday, but the weekend staff will be able to receive sputum
specimens and do AFB smears. This is really important because the lack of
weekend services is a reason some hospitals have given for not using State
Lab for TB. The State Lab offers top-notch knowledge and experience, and
state-of-the-art techniques. Plus everything is done in house, not shipped
out of state. So if your local hospitals are not using the State Lab for
TB, please let them know they will soon be able to get this excellent
service seven days per week, and it’s still free!! Don’t send those
weekend specimens yet, but watch for the announcement soon.
Please direct any
comments, questions, or items you would like to submit for the newsletter
to: Cheryl McRill, M.D., M.P.H. State TB Control Officer Arizona
Department of Health Services 150 N. 18th Ave, Suite 140,
Phoenix, AZ 85007 cmcrill@azdhs.gov 602-364-3856.
|