Screen
Readable Version
Tuberculosis Cases
and Rates per 100,000 Population, by County, Arizona 1997-2003
| |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
| |
R |
C |
R |
C |
R |
C |
R |
C |
R |
C |
R |
C |
R |
C |
| Apache |
29.1 |
19 |
10.6 |
7 |
16.4 |
11 |
7.2 |
5 |
21.6 |
15 |
14.3 |
10 |
7.1 |
5 |
| Cochise |
5.1 |
6 |
1.7 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
5.1 |
6 |
2.5 |
3 |
1.6 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
| Coconino |
3.5 |
4 |
3.4 |
4 |
4.9 |
6 |
3.4 |
4 |
7.7 |
9 |
7.2 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
| Gila |
4.3 |
2 |
8.5 |
4 |
9.9 |
5 |
5.8 |
3 |
5.8 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
7.5 |
4 |
| Graham |
9.3 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
11.9 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
2.9 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
| Greenlee |
22.9 |
2 |
11.3 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| La Paz |
5.3 |
1 |
5.2 |
1 |
15.6 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14.5 |
3 |
| Maricopa |
6.1 |
165 |
4.9 |
138 |
4.9 |
144 |
5.1 |
157 |
5.3 |
163 |
5.2 |
172 |
5.7 |
195 |
| Mohave |
4.5 |
6 |
4.4 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
5.2 |
8 |
3.9 |
6 |
2.4 |
4 |
1.2 |
2 |
| Navajo Co |
11.7 |
10 |
11.5 |
10 |
10.7 |
10 |
4.1 |
4 |
7.2 |
7 |
8.9 |
9 |
2.9 |
3 |
| Pima |
4.8 |
38 |
6.2 |
51 |
5.4 |
46 |
2.7 |
23 |
5.3 |
45 |
2.7 |
24 |
2.6 |
24 |
| Pinal |
12.1 |
18 |
4.6 |
7 |
9.1 |
15 |
8.3 |
15 |
6.1 |
11 |
7.3 |
14 |
14.9 |
30 |
| Santa Cruz |
0 |
0 |
13.6 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
5.2 |
2 |
10.4 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
4.9 |
2 |
| Yavapai |
1.4 |
2 |
1.4 |
2 |
3.2 |
5 |
1.8 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1.1 |
2 |
1.1 |
2 |
| Yuma |
15.6 |
20 |
11.4 |
15 |
8.6 |
12 |
16.9 |
27 |
13.7 |
22 |
8.2 |
14 |
14.3 |
25 |
| State Rate |
6.4 |
296 |
5.4 |
254 |
5.3 |
262 |
5.1 |
261 |
5.6 |
289 |
4.8 |
263 |
5.2 |
295 |
Note: R =
Rate, C = Cases
Data in this chart
are provisional.
Because of small
population sizes in some counties, an increase or decrease of only one
or two cases will result in dramatic rate increases or decreases from
one year to another.
For best results,
print the table landscape. |
